Dr. Hasan Nashid

Introduction and Book Overview

In contemporary South Asian English poetry, ‘The Caste of Flowers’ (April, 2026) by Nepali poet, translator, and educator Sushant Kumar B.K. stands as a groundbreaking addition. This comprehensive anthology of 108 pages is not merely a stylistic curation of words; rather, it serves as a profound socio-psychological testament to structural oppression, the caste system, gender-based trauma, and the multifaceted existential crises of human life. As an academician and translator, Sushant Kumar B.K. infuses his verses with theoretical depth while simultaneously capturing the unvarnished reality, repressed indignation, blood, and sweat of his own Dalit community’s lived experiences.

This academic review offers a thematic close reading of the poems within the collection, supported by empirical textual evidence, alongside a comparative evaluation of B.K.’s poetic philosophy against that of globally acclaimed contemporary poets.

Thematic Framework and Close Reading

A) Dalit Consciousness, Subaltern Speech, and Structural Inequality

The bedrock of this anthology aligns seamlessly with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s concept of ‘Subaltern’ studies—the marginalized subject has finally begun to speak in their own vocabulary. The titular poem, “The Caste of Flowers,” operates as a poignant metaphor for South Asian casteism. The poet juxtaposes the parallel journeys of two blossoms budding in a Dalit’s garden: ‘Kali’ (symbolizing the Dalit daughter) and ‘a rose’ (symbolizing the upper-caste paradigm):

“Two exquisite flowers / Budding in a Dalit’s garden, / Kali, a daughter, / and a rose…”

When an educated, affluent man arrives, he safely plucks and takes the rose to his home, while Kali is abandoned outside under the pretext that “an untouchable can’t enter the house.” Through the deliberate deployment of words like “touching,” “plucking,” and “desecrating,” the poet critically maps the historical trajectory of physical and psychological hegemony exercised by upper-caste patriarchy over Dalit women.

“The statue they craft / is put inside the temple, / But they are stopped at the entrance, / Forbidden to worship.”

This discourse assumes a more overtly political dimension in “Dalits’ Dreams Deferring.” Echoing Langston Hughes’ seminal concept of a ‘dream deferred,’ the poet questions whether Dalits are rightful citizens or mere refugees in their own motherland. He exposes a jarring societal and religious hypocrisy:

“The statue they craft / is put inside the temple, / But they are stopped at the entrance, / Forbidden to worship.”

This institutional segregation—where the hands that sculpt the deity are barred from entering the sanctum sanctorum—poses a radical challenge to the rhetoric of modern “inclusive democracy,” exposing it as an inequitable farce.

This repressed wrath reaches its zenith in “Call Me Down,” where the poet deconstructs the orthography of the word ‘DALIT’ as a semiotic site of oppression:

“Look at me: / I’m a five-letter word, / A D-A-L-I-T, / Symbol of injustice.”

Yet, the poem transcends lamentation; it is an anthem of resistance. In the resolution, the poet invokes the myth of the phoenix to herald a subaltern resurrection:

“But remember, / I’m down, a root / I will rise as a phoenix / Awaking with a new revolution.”

Furthermore, in “Dalit and Nature,” the poet illustrates how the dispossession of land forces the subaltern into an existential alignment with nature. The structural poverty of a roofless, dilapidated hut with “a plethora of massive holes” becomes the very window to a cosmic consciousness:

“No mansion, I have, / But a door-less old hut / with a plethora of massive holes / through which / at night I can see the sky…”

B) Re-reading Feminism: Trauma, Motherhood, and Agency

Feminism in B.K.’s poetry is not a theoretical luxury; it is a visceral battle for survival. In “Shadow of Death,” he employs an evocative allusion to the classical myth of ‘Leda and the Swan’ to delineate the predatory nature of carnal violence against female innocence:

“An evil shadow follows her everywhere… / Like Leda and the Swan, a display of human wickedness.”

The ultimate dark irony of the poem materializes when the protagonist, having survived assault outside, is violated within the domestic sphere by her own father, driving her to suicide as the ultimate escape. This represents the most grotesque manifestation of patriarchal tyranny.

Similarly, “Soul of a Single Mother” unveils the ruthless underbelly of capitalist, urban spaces. A mother migrates from village to city to secure quality education for her offspring, but finding no economic valuation for her labor, she is forced to commodify her own body:

“One day, / I sold my body to buy life for children / And auctioned my pride / To bargain books for their study.”

The tragic climax unfolds as the mature children scrutinize her choices through the lens of bourgeois morality, subjecting her to linguistic and behavioral abuse. B.K. thus tears away the facade of societal puritanism.

Nevertheless, the female subject is not merely a passive victim; her innate agency is fiercely asserted in “I am a Durga”. The days of being stripped or humiliated like the historical Yogmaya or the mythological Draupadi of the Mahabharata are over; the modern woman has claimed the apparatus of inscription:

“You cannot write / The history of my body. / I am a modern Durga, / Beyond the sword; / I also wield a revolutionary pen.”

C) Postmodern Psychoanalysis, Love, and the Philosophy of Abstraction

Parallel to his socio-political consciousness runs a deep psychological and philosophical investigation into romantic love. For B.K., love resists empirical taxonomy; it is an abstract phenomenon. In “Love is a Beautiful Abstraction,” he writes:

“You cannot truly love your lover / Once, fully understand or know. / Silence, unknown, undefined, discourse love is.”

The poet warns that an over-analytical curiosity regarding a lover’s past or present obliterates the intrinsic, abstract beauty of romance. In “She Is an Abstract to Me,” the elusive, inscrutable nature of the beloved serves as a catalyst for infinite poetic creation:

“Yet she becomes an abstract to me / That makes me write infinite poems / About her for ages and ages.”

However, this postmodern conception of love remains tethered to material realities. In “The Abandoned Letters,” the reader witnesses the premature death of a romance engineered by caste stratifications. The epistolary tokens of affection are rendered waste, discovered as makeshift tissue papers in a upscale café trash bin following the lover’s hypergamous marriage into a higher social stratum:

“Now, you are married / To someone else, / For, in the face of your values, / My caste fails.”

This emotional transmutation strikes a poignant chord. Conversely, *”Mind Not, O My Dear”* embraces the pluralistic iterations of modern relationships, acknowledging love as alternately spontaneous, democratic, or purely biological.

D) Global Crises, Pandemic, and Warfare

B.K.’s poetic canvas expands globally, transgressing domestic boundaries. Poems like “An Abstract Era” and “War or Peace?” capture the existential dread of the COVID-19 pandemic. The poet laments the dichotomy between the mounting casualties and the unvarnished corruption of political elites who embezzle relief funds:

“While estimated budget for corona / Goes to some people’s pockets.”

In “Why Do I Write Poems?”, the poet undergoes a profound meta-poetic interrogation regarding the efficacy of art in the face of geopolitical catastrophes, specifically referencing the humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. Amidst the smoke of warfare, verses offer no real refuge, resembling fragile paper airplanes:

“My poems are like paper airplanes— / They offer no safe landing for humanity, / Especially in Afghanistan.”

Comparative Literary Evaluation

Placing Sushant Kumar B.K.’s oeuvre within the global contemporary canon reveals compelling thematic confluences and stylistic departures from renowned world poets.

A) Langston Hughes and Sushant Kumar B.K.

Just as Langston Hughes articulated the systemic disenfranchisement and ‘Black Identity’ during the Harlem Renaissance, B.K. gives voice to ‘Dalit Identity’ and subalternity in South Asia. The direct ideological lineage of Hughes’ iconic *”Montage of a Dream Deferred”* is palpable in B.K.’s “Dalits’ Dreams Deferring”. While Hughes interrogates whether a deferred dream sags like a heavy load or explodes, B.K. illustrates how the systemic postponement of Dalit aspirations distances them daily from justice, implying an inevitable socio-political eruption. However, unlike Hughes’ reliance on the syncopated rhythms of jazz, B.K. adopts a more prosaic, declarative, and direct free verse format.

B) T. S. Eliot and Sushant Kumar B.K.

In “Why Do I Write Poems?” and “An Abstract Era,” B.K. transposes the spiritual vacuity of Eliot’s ‘The Waste Land’ onto contemporary war-torn Afghanistan and the pandemic-stricken world. While Eliot diagnosed the moral degeneration of post-WWI Europe, B.K. maps the fragmentation of postmodern capitalism and military industrialism. Yet, whereas Eliot’s tone remains fundamentally pessimistic, elitist, and steeped in high-classical allusions, B.K. retains a resilient optimism. Even amidst the Sisyphean absurdities of modern existence, he sings of revival and the phoenix.

C) Ocean Vuong and Sushant Kumar B.K.

The thematic intersections of trauma, corporality, and maternal memory found in the works of Vietnamese-American poet Ocean Vuong find a striking echo in B.K.’s “Soul of a Single Mother” and “Before You Go”. Both poets excel at filtering grand historical and structural traumas through the intimate lens of interpersonal relationships. However, where Vuong utilizes highly surreal, lyrical, and fractured syntax, B.K. opts for a style that is accessible, unpretentious, and consciously “sharp as broken glass”.

D) Namdeo Dhasal and Sushant Kumar B.K.

B.K.’s Dalit consciousness shares a radical affinity with the Marathi Dalit Panther movement pioneered by Namdeo Dhasal. Just as Dhasal weaponized the vernacular slang of the lumpenproletariat to subvert mainstream Marathi literature, B.K. integrates the marginalized spaces of Kathmandu’s Thamel nightlife (“Are They Moons?”) and the raw emotional interiority of sex workers (“The Whore”). Yet, where Dhasal’s aesthetic was confrontational and deliberately transgressive, B.K. tempers his outrage with academic erudition and philosophical frameworks (alluding to Plato, Freud, and Shakespeare), thereby translating localized fury into a universal humanistic discourse.

Stylistic Devices and Aesthetics

The defining attribute of Sushant Kumar B.K.’s prosody is its “unfussy yet sharp language”. As the preface astutely notes, his diction avoids superfluous riddles, functioning instead like shattered glass that inflicts a necessary, calculated wound upon the reader’s conscience.

The collection thrives on structural binaries:

Light vs. Darkness: In “The Sun and Me,” the poet equates his temporary societal subjugation with the setting sun, an absolute guarantee of tomorrow’s triumphant dawn.

Confinement vs. Liberation: In “Beauty and Rebel,” domestic confinement is equated to ‘Plato’s Cave,’ which is subsequently shattered by invoking the ancestral legacy of defying restrictions, drawing from the Edenic transgression of eating the forbidden fruit.

The Epistolary Metaphor: In “The Abandoned Letters,” the written word and lipstick impressions serve as motifs for intense romance, while their disposal as garbage underscores the ephemeral nature of human affection within a materialistic world order.

The structural architecture of the poems favors free verse. B.K. eschews dense narrative paragraphs in favor of brief, staccato stanzas, maximizing the conceptual weight of each line and compelling the reader to pause and reflect.

Critical Assessment and Limitations

For a rigorous academic review, it is imperative to address certain aesthetic limitations within the collection. In select pieces such as *”O Government”* or *”Condition Everywhere,”* the poet’s impulse toward immediate socio-political commentary occasionally overshadows poetic nuance. The language in these instances leans heavily toward direct editorial statement or political manifesto, occasionally compromising the layered ambiguity typically valued in postmodern verse.

However, this stylistic choice can be defended as a conscious ideological strategy. To convey the historical, intergenerational trauma of the subaltern, the unvarnished immediacy of speech may be politically and ethically more imperative than the elitist demands for aesthetic obfuscation.

Conclusion

Sushant Kumar B.K.’s ‘The Caste of Flowers’ is far more than an anthology of verse; it is a vital socio-political document asserting the existential validity of the marginalized. Emerging from the peripheral spaces of Nepal, the poet has successfully engineered a universal idiom capable of weaving together global pandemics, warfare, biological love, and caste stratifications into a cohesive tapestry of human resistance. In the contemporary tradition of subaltern literature, this text achieves a significant milestone, validating poetry as an indispensable instrument of truth and social justice.

Read: A humanoid demon in a tree

___________________

Dr. Hasan Nashid is PhD Research Fellow, Faculty of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

The post Book: ‘The Caste of Flowers’ first appeared on Sindh Courier.