Geneva

In Afghanistan, hundreds of former government officials and members of the armed forces have allegedly been killed despite assurances from the Taliban of an amnesty, the UN human rights office (OHCHR) said.

A new publication from the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) presents “credible” reports that between 15 August 2021 and 30 June 2023, the country’s de facto authorities were responsible for 218 extrajudicial killings, 14 enforced disappearances, over 144 instances of torture and ill treatment, and 424 arbitrary arrests and detentions.

‘Betrayal of trust’

UN human rights chief Volker Türk said that the targeting of former officials despite the announcement by the Taliban when it returned to power of a “general amnesty” for former government officials and members of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, is a “betrayal of the people’s trust”.

He urged the de facto authorities to prevent further abuses and hold perpetrators to account.

The report points out that officials from the previous democratically elected administration are entitled to the same human rights protections as all Afghans and that Afghanistan remains a party to international human rights treaties banning the violations described.

First-hand accounts of torture

In interviews, individuals recounted beatings with pipes, cables, verbal threats and abuse at the hands of de facto security force members.

UNAMA also heard from family members whose relatives had been arrested or gone missing, their bodies found days or even months later.

‘Whereabouts unknown’

In some instances, missing individuals have never been found. This was the case of the former Head of the Herat Women’s Prison, Alia Azizi, who never returned home from work on 2 October 2021.

As of 22 August 2023, her whereabouts remain unknown, UNAMA said, even though Taliban authorities reportedly “initiated an investigation” into her disappearance.

Impunity prevails

According to UNAMA, efforts by the de facto authorities to investigate and hold perpetrators accountable for the incidents described in the report have been “extremely limited”.

Investigations were announced in a handful of cases, but even then, UNAMA says, “progress lacks transparency and accountability; impunity prevails”.

No guidance on amnesty

The report calls on the Taliban to clarify the terms of the general amnesty and ensure that it is upheld.

UNAMA noted that to date, the de facto authorities have not publicly released any written text or guidance setting out the scope of the amnesty, which was only announced in public comments made by their leadership.

UNAMA Head Roza Otunbayeva said that the de facto authorities must demonstrate a “genuine commitment” to the general amnesty, which is a crucial step in ensuring “real prospects” for justice, reconciliation and peace in the country.

_________________

Courtesy: UN News (Posted on Aug 22, 2023)

The post Afghan Taliban accused of killing hundreds of former officials first appeared on Sindh Courier.

By Andrey Mihayloff

Rack

This is probably the most widely known type of torture. It is believed that the rack was first used in around 300 AD on Christian martyr Vincent of Zaragoza. Subsequently, the rack was widely used by the medieval Inquisition.

A person would be put on a special bed with rollers at both ends. Ropes would be wound around the rollers to hold the victim’s wrists and ankles. As the rollers would rotate, the ropes would stretch in opposite directions, severing ligaments in upper and lower extremities of the victim and displacing their bones.

In another version of the rack, the victim’s hands would be tied behind his or her back, and the person would then be suspended on the rope from a crossbar between two posts. The feet would often be tied together, so that the victim could not move them. As the rack worked, the victim’s arms tied behind the back would be twisted out of the joints.

In Russia, the rack had also found application. The victim on the rack would also be whipped on the back and tortured with fire. Sometimes, if the victim kept silence, the executioner would crush his or her ribs with red-hot pincers.

Burying alive

In Russia, the torture of burying alive in the ground would be used only against women accused of manicide. The poor wretch would be buried in the ground up to her neck, and the specially assigned guards would then watch that no one would give her food or water. People were only allowed to throw small coins, which would then be used to commemorate the soul of the executed. This kind of torture could last for days or even weeks.

Metal implantation

This torture was used in the Middle-Ages. An incision would be made on the victim’s body, and a piece of metal would be placed into the wound that would be subsequently stitched up. The metal would start to oxidate in a while, thus causing unbearable pain to the victim. The pain could be so strong that a person would tear their own flesh to pull out the piece of metal just to die of blood loss.

Pectoral

This torture was used by medieval inquisitors during the trials of “witches”. The pectoral itself was something like a bra, which was usually made of precious metals and could be encrusted with precious stones.

The executioner would heat the pectoral red-hot and put it to the breast of the woman accused of witchcraft. The executioner would repeat it several times until the unfortunate woman would “plead guilty.” Victims would very often have their breasts completely charred in this torture.

Impalement

This type of execution was widely practiced in the East. The tied victim would be impaled on a stake that would be hammered into the victim’s anus. The stake with the victim on it would then be installed straight up into the ground. Gravity and convulsions would cause the victim to slide down the stake slowly. The tip of the stake would then come out from between the ribs or even from the mouth, causing the victim to die from numerous ruptures of internal organs.

In Russia, this type of execution would often be used against, for example, rebels and traitors.

Cradle of Judas

This torture was used by the Spanish Inquisition. The victim, with his or her hands and feet tied, would be seated on top of a pointed pyramid so that the top of it would stick into the anus or vagina. Gradually, with the help of ropes, the victim on the pointed pyramid would be lowered towards the floor.

The torture could last from several hours to several days, until the victim would die of pain or blood loss due to the rupture of soft tissues. One could also die from infections, as the tip of the pyramid was never disinfected.

Red Tulip

It is believed that this is how Afghan guerrillas executed captured Russian soldiers. Before starting the execution procedure, guerrillas would drug the victim to reduce his sensitivity to pain, as they wanted the prisoner to experience the torture completely.

After the soldier was unconscious due to narcotic intoxication, he would be hung down by his arms. His skin would be incised just below the abdomen in a circle around his waist. Afterwards, the skin would be ripped off the body, pulled up the torso and tied above the head. Visually, the execution made the victim look like a red tulip. As the effect of the drugs would pass, the victim would slowly come to his senses to experience nothing but unbearable pain. Some of the victims would stay alive for a few hours, dying a long and painful death.

_________________________

Courtesy: Pravda

https://english.pravda.ru/history/149382-torture/

The post Most horrific types of torture in history first appeared on Sindh Courier.

Here is the story of Torture’s Terrible Toll at Guantanamo Bay where the United States had shipped Muslim men and boys to hastily constructed wire cages at its naval base. Roughly 780 people were taken captive there. Nine men have died at Guantanamo, six by suspected suicide. Forty still languish there. Of the dozen men charged with a crime – including the handful accused of planning 9/11, haven’t yet gone to trial and won’t this year.

By Scott Roehm

Nineteen years ago, the United States began shipping Muslim men and boys to hastily constructed wire cages at its naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Roughly 780 people were eventually taken captive there, most turned over by Afghan militias or Pakistani forces that seized them after the United States invaded Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks.

In its early days, some Bush administration officials referred to Guantanamo as the “legal equivalent of outer space.” Others called it “America’s Battle Lab.” The former proved less accurate than was hoped: lawyers managed to access Guantanamo and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that detainees had a constitutional right to challenge the legality of their detention. The latter term, however, was prescient.

Guantanamo’s Joint Task Force-170 was given responsibility “for the worldwide management of interrogation of suspected terrorists detained in support of [U.S.] military operations.” The Task Force discharged that responsibility by developing strategies to “break” detainees. The resulting torture was very much the equivalent of what was done at secret CIA prisons and spread quickly to Afghanistan, then to Iraq, culminating in the horrors of Abu Ghraib.

Nine men have died at Guantanamo, six by suspected suicide. Forty still languish there at a cost of $540 million per year. Of the dozen men actually charged with a crime—including the handful accused of planning 9/11, who haven’t yet gone to trial and won’t this year—their cases have exposed Guantanamo’s novel military court system for the catastrophe that it is.

For many years Guantanamo was an issue of public significance and regular—if sporadic—debate. It is now largely forgotten, but not by everyone. What follows is a look at Guantanamo through the eyes of five people whose lives the prison still impacts dramatically.

Sharqawi Al-Hajj was captured in February 2002 and rendered by the CIA to Jordan, where he was held in secret and tortured for nearly two years. “They beat me in a way that does not know any limits,” he wrote in a note smuggled out of his Jordanian prison. “[They said] we’ll make you see death. . . . They threatened to rape me.”

He was then rendered to a CIA black site in Afghanistan and “kept in complete darkness and subjected to continuous loud music” until his 2004 transfer to Guantanamo.

Two decades of cruel captivity have damaged Al-Hajj, physically and psychologically. He suffers from profound weakness and fatigue; recurrent jaundice; severe abdominal pain; and difficult, painful urination. In 2017, after a several week-long hunger strike due to increasing despair over his poor health and indefinite detention, he fell unconscious and required emergency hospitalization. He has been repeatedly hospitalized for hunger strikes since.

In 2019, Al-Hajj threatened suicide. “Maybe I’m going to cut my nerves to make myself bleed. Maybe that’s what I need to do,” he told his lawyer. “I have to do something, try to kill myself. For how long can I be patient? I’m human.”

He cut his wrists with a piece of broken glass during a phone call several weeks later. He said that he was bleeding “but [his] body doesn’t have any liquid left,” and that he was “sorry for doing this but they treat [detainees] like animals.”

In a letter earlier this year, Al-Hajj wrote, “I feel desperate because I don’t see how anyone will be able to put an end to this injustice.”

Colleen Kelly is the co-founder of September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, an organization born out of a small group of family members of those killed during the attacks who united to turn their grief into action for peace. Kelly visits and reflects on Guantanamo often, but especially on this anniversary day each year.

“My brother Bill Kelly was murdered on 9/11 in what was likely the most public event in history. While people around the globe watched two towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania burn, I watched Bill being murdered, one agonizing moment after another.

“I expected accountability for Bill’s murder to be just as public so that everyone, family members included, could see the United States respond with fair and impartial justice. Instead, America chose two wars and a secret torture program. It opened Guantanamo and reinvented military commissions.”

Kelly insists that she didn’t want any of this and is increasingly frustrated that, after almost 20 years, there’s no resolution.

“I sat with Rita Lasar, another cofounder of Peaceful Tomorrows, in 2012, and watched the arraignment of the 9/11 accused. Rita is now deceased. I was on the plane to Guantanamo carrying the only 9/11 family member yet to be deposed in the pretrial hearings. Lee Hanson is now deceased. My parents are in their 80s and still don’t have my brother’s remains.”

“This pattern must end. The 20th anniversary of 9/11 is fast approaching. 9/11 families, and the world, are watching.”

Sondra Crosby is a medical doctor and professor at Boston University. She has evaluated nearly 1000 torture survivors in her practice, including in the Middle East and Central Asia. She has also spent as much time as any other independent medical expert evaluating Guantanamo detainees and interfacing with Guantanamo’s medical care system.

“For years now,” Crosby explains, “a variety of detainees’ medical needs, which are often linked to their torture and prolonged indefinite detention, have outstripped Guantanamo’s medical care capabilities. The prison’s inability or unwillingness to properly diagnose and treat certain conditions has caused needless suffering and repeatedly violated the government’s duty to provide adequate medical care.”

Guantanamo’s medical care deficiencies result from a number of factors, ranging from a lack of expertise and equipment to military medical providers refusing to ask about or document detainees’ trauma, to detainees distrusting those same providers due to a history of medical complicity in torture.

“The situation is precarious now and it’s going to get worse,” Crosby warns. “As the men age, they will increasingly present with medical needs that Guantanamo simply can’t manage. If the problems aren’t addressed and Guantanamo remains open, I’m very concerned that men will begin to die.”

Eric Kerska is a retired Army colonel whose daughter, Erika, deployed to Guantanamo with a Minnesota National Guard company last summer. This was Sergeant Kerska’s second deployment there and her father was livid at the way she and her fellow troops were treated.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Guantanamo adopted measures to protect against the virus spreading across the base. Those protocols’ adequacy and their impact on the rights and health of both detainees and military personnel have raised serious concerns, including among members of Congress.

Upon arriving at Guantanamo, each member of Sergeant Kerska’s unit was effectively isolated for 14 days in nine-foot-by-12-foot “containerized housing.”

“I’ve never heard of such a thing in my 37 years being associated with the U.S military,” Colonel Kerska told his local NBC affiliate. “If you look up the definition of solitary confinement; they are essentially in solitary confinement.

“There are states that don’t even do [this] to prisoners,” he continued. “I believe this is wrong, I believe it’s illegal and certainly immoral.”

Alka Pradhan is Human Rights Counsel at the Guantanamo military commissions representing Ammar al Baluchi, one of five men against whom the government is seeking the death penalty for their alleged involvement in planning the 9/11 attacks.

The case has involved more than eight years of pretrial proceedings, seven different judges, and is still mired in litigation over the detainee’s years-long torture before arriving at Guantanamo. Hearings have been suspended since February 2020 because of COVID-19 restrictions. A trial appears nowhere in sight.

“There is no aspect of the 9/11 case that isn’t deeply tragic,” Pradhan says. “The U.S. government chose to torture these men, and damage them permanently. It chose to withhold medical care from them. It chose to prosecute them at Guantanamo using evidence derived from their torture and to argue that U.S. law doesn’t apply in a courtroom flying the U.S. flag. It continues to insist on pervasive secrecy. The end result is that there can never be a fair trial for 9/11.”

Pradhan also warns about the ripple effect on national security of the lack of accountability for U.S. torture: “By failing to hold senior officials responsible for knowingly breaking the law, the U.S. government freed them to spread disinformation about the ‘efficacy’ of torture and Guantanamo. In reality, both were disastrous for intelligence-gathering and security alliances. Nineteen years later, government disinformation has metastasized into every aspect of ‘national security’ in America and is now itself one of our biggest threats.”

President Biden has entered office with the United States in crisis on multiple fronts and Guantanamo outside the public eye. Ironically, that might afford him an unusually conducive political environment for closing the prison. My colleagues and I developed a roadmap for his administration to do so swiftly and responsibly. He should seize the opportunity so that everyone Guantanamo continues to impact can at least begin to put this dark chapter behind them.

_________________________

Courtesy: Open Society Foundation. This article was published on January 11, 2021

About the Author

Scott Roehm is Washington director of the Center for Victims of Torture.

The post Guantanamo Bay: Torture’s Terrible Toll first appeared on Sindh Courier.