A guide for Economics Teachers

Economics is a way of thinking about society.

Specifically and ultimately, economics supplies indispensable mental habits and analytical tools for gaining a better understanding of why and how it is that each of us, every moment of every day, enjoy the fruits of the labors and creativity of literally billions of strangers.

By Nazarul Islam

In just over a week ‘Zoom’ will help me in assisting 159 students in this Fall-2021 ECON 302 COURSE – “Principles of Microeconomics”. And later on, barring any last-minute change, I’ll meet them in person, rather than over Zoom.

These students are mostly 19/20 year-old freshmen. While a petite handful of them will have taken a decent economics course in high school, the great majority of these students will have, as they file into the auditorium of University’s Enterprise Hall for the first day of class, no earthly idea what economics is.

Most of the students entrusted to me will begin the course with the mistaken notion that economics teaches skills at running a business, or for doing finance. Or they will suppose that economics is about the practice of entrepreneurship – or about predicting the trend in the prices of precious metals or of stock indices. But I’ll immediately correct these misimpressions.

As the classroom ‘Manager’, I hope to share this with students: Forget what you think you know about economics. Economics is a way of thinking about society. Specifically and ultimately, economics supplies indispensable mental habits and analytical tools for gaining a better understanding of why and how it is that each of us, every moment of every day, enjoy the fruits of the labors and creativity of literally billions of strangers.

Perhaps I’m biased. But I sincerely believe – believe to the point that I know – that principles of microeconomics is the most important economics course any student will take. Ever. By far. Indeed, it’s one of the most important among all college courses that a student will take.

If the concept is shared properly, and learned with an open and critical and attentive mind, a course in the principles of microeconomics will impart to the student more and clear understanding of the operation of economies than will all other economics courses combined – and I include here even well-taught PhD econ courses.

Far too many academic economists are bored with economic principles.

These principles are so basic. I mean fundamental. No genius is required to understand these principles or to teach them well. Teaching economic principles provides little opportunity to showcase cleverness, to display brilliance, or to push out the frontiers of understanding or research. It is, instead, to spend a few months of class time repeating timeless truths almost all of which have been known and understood by wise economists for more than two centuries.

But no matter. There’s absolutely nothing that I enjoy more than sharing the principles of microeconomics. I live to do it. And at the beginning of the class, in the hours leading up to the first meeting of each such introductory session, I feel the surge of excitement that I felt (and still recall as if it were yesterday) back in January 1973, when as a student I first encountered the power of supply-and-demand reasoning in my own first economics course.

My goal in conveying new learners that Principles of Microeconomics is not to launch students towards a path to earn degrees in the subject, or even for them to become Economics majors. While I’m always pleased when a student, after taking the class, switches his or her major to economics, I share the contents of the course on the assumption that this is the only economics course these students will ever take.

So unlike many other intro-econ courses, I do absolutely no mathematics; I even refrain from drawing any of the cost curves that I encountered as a student in my first economics course.

I do define a handful of esoteric terms, such as the “law of diminishing marginal utility” and the “law of one price,” but I never mention many other terms – such as “perfect competition” or “marginal rates of substitution” – that are typical fare in most other principles-of-microeconomic courses. I wouldn’t even dream of doing, in this introductory course, the likes of indifference-curve analysis.

The course is opened with some economic history. (“Have you any idea how magnificently, materially prosperous you are compared to the vast majority of your ancestors? Because you’re too young to remember a world even without smartphones, of course you don’t appreciate just how prosperous you are.

So let me tell you!

I next like to inform my students about Adam Smith and Julian Simon, followed by my best efforts to rock their world by introducing them to the principle of comparative advantage.

I’m not embarrassed to confess that when I demonstrate comparative advantage I am intentionally theatrical. It’s a powerful principle that I want all students never forget.

After some additional introductory material – not the least of which includes a warning against the commission of various logical fallacies (such as the fallacy of composition) – it’s on to the course’s core: supply and demand. I will later devote two whole sections to international trade, another to public choice, and one to public goods and taxation. All this adds a new flavor in the young minds!

The obvious goal – by teaching basic, foundational, principles of microeconomics – is to inoculate students against the bulk of the common economic myths that they’ll encounter throughout their lives – myths such as that the great abundance of goods and services available to us denizens of modernity is the result of a process that can be easily mimicked or understood in detail by smart people or planners – that the market value of goods or services can be raised as desired by price floors (such as a legislated minimum wages).

Or, lowered as desired by price ceilings (such as rent controls) – that benefits can be created without costs – that government is an institution capable of rising above the realities that ensure that private institutions never perform ‘perfectly’ – that intentions are results – that destruction of property is a source of prosperity – that exchange across political boundaries differs in economically meaningful ways from exchange that takes place within political boundaries – that the only consequences that occur or that matter are those that are easily anticipated and seen.

If I have a calling in life, that calling is to teach principles of microeconomics. I’m inexpressibly grateful for having had the opportunity to do so!

(This write up is dedicated to my childhood friend and Economist, Tanvir Khan, PhD)

Nazarul Islam

The Bengal-born writer Nazarul Islam is a senior educationist based in USA. He writes for Sindh Courier and the newspapers of Bangladesh, India and America. He is author of a recently published book ‘Chasing Hope’ – a compilation of his 119 articles.




Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button