Corporate Farming and the Concerns of Sindh

Farmers and landowners in Sindh have voiced strong objections to the corporate farming initiative

Dr. AG Arijo

These days, there has been too much talk about corporate farming. Let us provide a brief overview of the issue surrounding grant of land for corporate farming in Sindh province of Pakistan. The Sindh government has approved more than 52,000 acres of state land to attract private investment in agriculture as part of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) initiative. However, this decision has incited protests from farmers and activists, who argue that it threatens small-scale farming. Critics contend that the project favors corporate interests over local livelihoods, raising concerns about land leases benefiting private companies associated with the Pakistan military. The debate continues as stakeholders assess the economic advantages against the environmental and social repercussions.

To gain a clearer understanding, it is essential to define corporate farming and explore its proposed implementation. Corporate farming refers to large-scale agricultural operations that are managed by corporations or private investors, rather than by individual farmers. These operations typically leverage advanced technology, mechanization, and modern irrigation techniques to enhance productivity. The Sindh government claims that it has proposed corporate farming as a strategy to boost agricultural output, attract investment, and improve food security. Official advocates believe that it can modernize farming practices and elevate crop yields, potentially decreasing Pakistan’s dependence on food imports.

The grant of 52,713 acres of land in Sindh for corporate farming has generated significant controversy. These lands have traditionally been utilized by local farmers and communities for small-scale agriculture. Critics express concerns that corporate farming may displace these local farmers, disrupt established farming practices, and lead to environmental issues. Additionally, the involvement of foreign investors and the Pakistan military in the management of these lands has raised further apprehensions regarding land rights and the equitable distribution of resources. The debate persists as stakeholders consider the potential economic benefits alongside the risks posed to local livelihoods and environmental sustainability.

There are farmers’ and landowners’ concerns. To understand this point, we need to discuss the concerns and objections raised by farmers and landowners, and highlight their perspective on how corporate farming might affect them.

Farmers and landowners in Sindh have voiced strong objections to the corporate farming initiative, arguing that it threatens their livelihoods and traditional farming practices. Their concerns include:

Loss of ancestral land: Many farmers fear that corporate farming will lead to the displacement of small-scale farmers, pushing them off lands they have cultivated for generations.

Water scarcity: The construction of six new canals to support corporate farms has raised alarms about water diversion from the Indus River, potentially reducing access for local farmers.

Economic inequality: Critics argue that corporate farming benefits large investors and foreign entities, while local farmers struggle with rising costs and limited resources.

Environmental impact: Intensive farming methods used by corporations could lead to soil degradation, deforestation, and loss of biodiversity, further harming the ecosystem.

Political concerns: Some activists claim that the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), once a champion of farmers’ rights, is now prioritizing corporate interests over local communities.

Farmers and landowners demand greater transparency, fair land distribution, and policies that protect their rights. Many have joined protests, calling for a halt to corporate farming projects until their concerns are addressed. The debate continues as the government weighs economic benefits against social and environmental consequences.

Possible solutions

It is essential to prioritize the needs and rights of the local community. Establish farmer advisory councils to ensure that local farmers have a voice in policy decisions. This would empower them to negotiate fair land leases and safeguard their rights.

Sustainable Farming Practices be promoted eco-friendly farming techniques that preserve soil health and protect water resources. Government-supported training programs could facilitate farmers’ transition to modern methods while minimizing environmental impact. Possible solutions involve fostering a more collaborative relationship between the government and local farmers. It is essential to prioritize the needs and rights of the local community.

Inclusive decision-making to establish farmer advisory councils to ensure that local farmers have a voice in policy decisions. This would empower them to negotiate fair land leases and safeguard their rights. Sustainable farming practices should have a chance to promote eco-friendly farming techniques that preserve soil health and protect water resources. Government-supported training programs could facilitate farmers’ transition to modern methods while minimizing environmental impact. Possible solutions involve fostering a more collaborative relationship between the government and local farmers. It is essential to prioritize the needs and rights of the local community.

Instead of allocating vast areas of land to corporations, a fair land distribution model should be considered. The government could distribute smaller plots to local farmers under cooperative models, allowing them to leverage modern technology while retaining control over their land.

Water management plans must ensure that new irrigation projects do not disrupt traditional water access. It is vital for farmers to be consulted on water-sharing agreements to prevent shortages.

Transparent policies are crucial. Strengthening legal protections can help prevent exploitation. By prioritizing the needs of local farmers, the government can foster a balanced agricultural system that promotes both economic growth and community well-being. The Sindh Agriculture Research Council (SARC) has already advocated for fair subsidies and protections of tenancy rights for farmers. Elevating such initiatives could lead to a more equitable and sustainable agricultural landscape.

By fostering collaboration and transparency, Sindh can modernize agriculture while upholding farmers’ livelihoods, creating a system that benefits local communities.

Read: Save The Dying Indus Delta

_______________

Dr. Abdullah G. Arijo is a retired professor, ex: chairman, Department of Parasitology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, ex-advisor Academics & P&D to Vice Chancellor, SAU Tandojam. Email: Email: abdullaharijo@gmail.com